Abilità motorie: la valutazione con il protocollo MOBAK
published in October - December 2019 - Sport&Medicina - issue n.4

There are no translations available.


  1. The Council of the European Union. Recommendations Council of 26 November 2013 on promoting health-enhancing physical activity across sectors (2013/C 354/01-5). Official Journal of the European Union.
  2. European Commission. Report from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on promoting health-enhancing physical activity across sectors. Brussels, 5.12.2016, COM (2016) 768 final.
  3. European Commission, EU Work Plan for Sport 2014-2017, (2015). Expert Group on Health-enhancing physical activity. Recommendations to encourage physical education in schools, including motor skills in early childhood, and to create valuable interactions with the sport sector, local authorities and the private sector, 2015.
  4. UNESCO. Quality physical education (QPE), Guidelines for policy-makers. Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2015.
  5. Colella D. Stili d’insegnamento, apprendimento motorio e processo educativo. Formazione & Insegnamento, 2016; XIV-1-Suppl, 25-34.
  6. Gallahue DL, Ozmun JC, Goodway JD. Understanding motor development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults, 7th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
  7. Bonaventure G. From scheme to praxis... from a praxis to another praxis.. from praxis to competence. J Fédérat Interna Educ Phys 2002; 71(1): 24-41.
  8. Clark JE, Metcalfe JS. The mountain of motor development: A metaphor. In: JE Clark, JH Humphrey (eds). Motor development: Research and reviews (Vol. 2). Reston, VA: National Association of Sport and Physical Education, 2002.
  9. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents. review of associated health benefits. Sports Med 2010; 40(12): 1019-35.
  10. Pesce C, Marchetti R, Motta A, Bellucci M (Eds). Joy of moving. Movimenti e immaginazione. Perugia: Calzetti-Mariucci, 2015.
  11. Colella D. Physical Literacy e stili d’insegnamento. Ri-orientare l’educazione fisica a scuola. Formazione & Insegnamento 2018; XVI(1): 33-42.
  12. Barnett LM, Stodden D, Cohen KE, et al. Fundamental movement skills: an important focus. J Teach Phys Educ 2016; 35(3): 219-25.
  13. Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Cliff DP, et al. Fundamental movement skill interventions in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013; 132(5): e1361-83.
  14. Cattuzzo MT, Dos Santos HR, Ré AH, et al. Motor competence and health related physical fitness in youth: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19(2), 123-9.
  15. Lima RA, Pfeiffer K, Larsen LR, et al. Physical activity and motor competence present a positive reciprocal longitudinal relationship across childhood and early adolescence. J Phys Act Health 2017; 14: 440-7.
  16. Miller A, Eather N, Duncan M, Lubans DR. Associations of object control motor skill proficiency, game play competence, physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness among primary school children, J Sports Sci 2019; 37(2): 173-9.
  17. Hulteen RM, Morgan PJ, Barnett LM, Stodden DF, Lubans DR. Development of foundational movement skills: a conceptual model for physical activity across the lifespan. Sports Medi 2018; 48(11): 1533-40.
  18. Burton AW, Davis WE. Ecological task analysis: Utilizing intrinsic measures in research and practice. Human Movement Science1995; 15: 285-314.
  19. Cools W, De Martelaer K, Samaey C, Andries C. Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: A review of seven movement skill assessment tools. J Sports Sci Med 2009; 8: 154-68.
  20. Dudley DA. A conceptual model of observed physical literacy. Phys Educ 2015; 72: 236-70.
  21. Harris J, Cale L. A review of children’s fitness testing. Eur Phys Educ Review 2006; 12: 201-25.
  22. Kolimechkov S. Physical fitness assessment in children and adolescent: A systematic review. Eur J Phys Educ Sport Sci 2017; 3(4): 65-79.
  23. Colella D. Competenze motorie e processo di valutazione. Lecce: Pensamultimedia, 2003.
  24. Longmiur P, Boyer C, Lloyd M, et al. Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8-12 years of age. J Health Sci, 2017; 6, 231-240.
  25. Naughton GA, Carlson JS. Greene DA. A challenge to fitness testing in primary schools. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 40-5
  26. Edwards LC, Bryant AS, Keegan RJ, et al. Measuring physical literacy and related constructs: A systematic review of empirical findings. Sports Med 2018; 48: 659-82.
  27. Herrmann C, Bund A, Gerlach E, et al. A review of the assessment of basic motor qualifications and competencies in school. Inter J Phys Educ 2015; 52(3): S2-13.
  28. Herrmann C, Bund A, Gerlach, E, et al. A review of the assessment of basic motor qualifications and competencies in school. Inter J Phys Educ 2005; 3(3):2-13.
  29. Herrmann C, Seelig H. Structure and profiles of basic motor competencies in the third grade. Validation of the Test Instrument MOBAK-3. Perceptual and motor skills 2017; 124 (1):5-20.
  30. Herrmann C, Heim C, Seelig H. Construct and correlates of basic motor competencies in primary school-aged children. J Sport Health Sci 2017; 8(1): 63-70.
  31. Scheuer C, Herrmann C, Bund A. Motor tests for primary school aged children: A systematic review. J Sport Sci 2019; 37(10): 1097-112.
  32. MOBAK